Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Dual T2370 714 User benchmarks, average bench 30% uPGA-478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Memory 32.2 1-Core 18.7 2-Core 37.1 19% 29.3 Pts	4-Core 37.7 8-Core 39.3 5% 38.5 Pts	64-Core 36.8 2% 36.8 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600M GT 2,041 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 011E) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.8% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 0.6 1% 1 fps	MRender 0.8 Gravity 1.2 Splatting 0.4 1% 0.8 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.8% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 149 129 120 132 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.2% Poor	Read 117 Write 73 Mixed 144 SusWrite 128 26% 115 MB/s	4K Read 8.9 4K Write 12.3 4K Mixed 9.6 32% 10.3 MB/s	DQ Read 89.4 DQ Write 76.2 DQ Mixed 51.6 47% 72.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	9.19% Terrible	MC Read 3.7 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 2.6 9% 3 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 2.6 7% 2.5 GB/s	Latency 242 16% 242 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.19% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo T6670IntelBench 35%, 2,094 samples	4x
Core2 Duo T9300Intel $70Bench 38%, 3,287 samples	2x
Pentium Dual T2370IntelBench 30%, 714 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce 8600M GTNvidiaBench 1%, 2,041 samples	5x
GeForce 8400M GSNvidiaBench 1%, 2,357 samples	3x
GeForce 9300M GSNvidiaBench 1%, 2,044 samples	2x

SSD
SKC600256G 256GBKingstonBench 102%, 6,756 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16