Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4 987 User benchmarks, average bench 65% LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Memory 73.8 1-Core 84.4 2-Core 164 62% 107 Pts	4-Core 312 8-Core 620 55% 466 Pts	64-Core 1,959 121% 1,959 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 9,043 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.09 Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.9% Below average	Lighting 36.7 Reflection 41.3 Parallax 36.6 30% 38.2 fps	MRender 46.4 Gravity 35.1 Splatting 39.5 33% 40.3 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 21,542 User benchmarks, average bench 238% 293GB free (System drive) Firmware: 6L6QCXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1181 1076 1216 1071 1045 1253 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	211% Outstanding	Read 1,992 Write 948 Mixed 551 SusWrite 1,140 256% 1,158 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 68.2 4K Mixed 42.3 135% 46.7 MB/s	DQ Read 520 DQ Write 371 DQ Mixed 471 345% 454 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 211% Great: 306%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA451R7AFR8N-UH 4x4GB 667 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 12 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	63.8% Good	MC Read 29.3 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 20.5 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 15.7 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 92.8 43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 113%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16