Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '21 at 04:42
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 73.3
2-Core 140
60% 98.6 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 437
42% 345 Pts
64-Core 417
26% 417 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153
CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 26.7
Parallax 14.5
17% 20.6 fps
MRender 31.3
Gravity 26.4
Splatting 25.8
22% 27.8 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$54
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427ANR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 120 145 148 152 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 428
Write 388
Mixed 381
SusWrite 146
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 71
4K Mixed 44.6
144% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 222
173% 239 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 118%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$47
466GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 164 164 166 166 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 162
Mixed 88.9
SusWrite 165
107% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 105%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
738GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 169 171 173 173 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 161
Mixed 109
SusWrite 170
112% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
181GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 87 87 88 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
53% Above average
Read 97.4
Write 90.2
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 87.1
61% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53%
Great: 58%
WD WD2004FBYZ-01YCBB0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: RR04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 174 175 176 176 176 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 128
Write 211
Mixed 98.9
SusWrite 177
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
380% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C11-8GNT 1866 CL10 Series 1866 CL10 Series 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
29.8% Poor
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 7.1
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback