| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 19.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| System | Dell Studio XPS 435MT (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Dell 0R849J |
| Memory | 8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.2 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20091221 |
| Uptime | 1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 08 '21 at 18:30 |
| Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.1%
Good
|
58% 92.8 Pts
|
36% 285 Pts
|
21% 337 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
|
19.4%
Very poor
|
20% 22.6 fps
|
19% 23.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$275
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 139 206 203 212 211 MB/s
|
56.6%
Above average
|
47% 207 MB/s
|
105% 35 MB/s
|
38% 50.1 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
46GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 18 MB/s
|
18.8%
Very poor
|
31% 24 MB/s
|
221% 3.23 MB/s
| |
|
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
24GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
|
14.4%
Very poor
|
24% 20 MB/s
|
135% 2.63 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
43.7%
Average
|
44% 15.3 GB/s
|
29% 10.3 GB/s
|
57% 69.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Studio XPS 435MT Builds (Compare 319 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Dell Studio XPS 435MT
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 268x |
| Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 18x |
| Xeon W3580IntelBench 72%, 653 samples | 13x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples | 17x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 13x |
| Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 14,988 samples | 13x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $184 |