| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 40.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1750 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190524 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 13 '21 at 21:25 |
| Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
| Run User | PER-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
87.6%
Excellent
|
87% 155 Pts
|
71% 574 Pts
|
42% 673 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 86B6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
40.5%
Average
|
44% 50.4 fps
|
35% 42.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 74 36 46 43 27 MB/s
|
39.2%
Below average
|
57% 258 MB/s
|
57% 20.5 MB/s
|
27% 37.5 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67
577GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 165 164 164 163 168 MB/s
|
99.4%
Outstanding
|
101% 140 MB/s
|
142% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
76.2%
Very good
|
78% 27.4 GB/s
|
58% 20.5 GB/s
|
63% 63 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,265 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples | 1,615x |
| Core i5-9400FIntel $101Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,215x |
| Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 177x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples | 831x |
| GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 480x |
| RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples | 428x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 102% - Outstanding | Total price: $438 |