PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 77% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO (all builds) |
Memory | 48.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.2 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180314 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 15 '21 at 03:26 |
Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 77% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
61.3%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
35.1%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 253 189 179 189 161 MB/s
|
77%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$154
911GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 947 1485 1673 1073 888 880 MB/s
|
223%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$40
334GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 92 91 91 92 90 MB/s
|
55.2%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A.C8FE 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2197 MHz
|
63.3%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 3,160x |
Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples | 231x |
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 220x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 742x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 645x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 446x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $1,130 |