| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock X370 Gaming X (all builds) |
| Memory | 28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20171107 |
| Uptime | 4 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 17 '21 at 13:30 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
77.9%
Very good
|
75% 137 Pts
|
80% 675 Pts
|
77% 1,247 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.79
|
28.7%
Poor
|
30% 35.3 fps
|
25% 32 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
286GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 859 590 588 584 581 576 MB/s
|
196%
Outstanding
|
270% 1,212 MB/s
|
170% 60.3 MB/s
|
490% 671 MB/s
|
|
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29
75GB free
Firmware: VT100-50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 53 53 53 53 MB/s
|
30%
Poor
|
28% 36.9 MB/s
|
112% 0.77 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
74.7%
Very good
|
76% 26.7 GB/s
|
69% 24 GB/s
|
40% 98.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X370 Gaming X Builds (Compare 235 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming X
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 26x |
| Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples | 24x |
| Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 22x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 16x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 13x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 13x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 100% - Outstanding | Total price: $398 |