Acer Nitro N50-600

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	40% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Acer Nitro N50-600 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Nitro N50-600(DCH)
Memory	18.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200408
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '21 at 16:28
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	76%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	59.5% Above average	Memory 65.6 1-Core 101 2-Core 187 66% 118 Pts	4-Core 287 8-Core 637 54% 462 Pts	64-Core 656 41% 656 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Sapphire(174B A548) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	40% Average	Lighting 52 Reflection 52.7 Parallax 46.3 42% 50.3 fps	MRender 41.2 Gravity 46.4 Splatting 42.4 35% 43.3 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ1 128GB 4,828 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 76 33 37 43 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	61.4% Good	Read 485 Write 365 Mixed 346 SusWrite 79.2 71% 319 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 34.6 4K Mixed 22.1 70% 24 MB/s	DQ Read 354 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 280 228% 322 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 130%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 127GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 117 117 117 116 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Read 142 Write 145 Mixed 70.6 SusWrite 118 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$80 110,884 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	65.2% Good	MC Read 25.4 MC Write 26.3 MC Mixed 23.1 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 12.6 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Nitro N50-600 Builds (Compare 4,395 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

System: Acer Nitro N50-600

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,888x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	1,318x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	420x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	877x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	547x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	528x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples	660x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	245x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GBKingstonBench 100%, 13,793 samples	227x

RAM
M378A1K43DB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 7,517 samples	329x
M378A1K43DB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 79%, 6,043 samples	314x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 44%, 10,608 samples	198x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $257

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16