Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	56.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	8.26% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock B450M Steel Legend (all builds)
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191127
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '21 at 23:53
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Memory 66.9 1-Core 96.6 2-Core 193 66% 119 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 568 54% 450 Pts	64-Core 782 48% 782 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 3716) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (71 fps cap detected)	56.1% Above average	Lighting 70.1 Reflection 71.9 Parallax 71.9 57% 71.3 fps	MRender 60.8 Gravity 70.3 Splatting 66.2 54% 65.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Adata SU630 240GB 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: N191129a SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 1.8 31 1.6 39 1.9 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	8.26% Terrible	Read 180 Write 79.3 Mixed 97.5 SusWrite 17.2 21% 93.6 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 8.26% Great: 101%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$113 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 478GB free Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.5 1.5 3 3.6 3.4 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	8.81% Terrible	Read 30.5 Write 1.5 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 2.7 2% 9.85 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 4.4 26% 6.63 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 8.81% Great: 128%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 731GB free Firmware: 0637 SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 31 31 31 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Read 32.3 Write 31.5 Mixed 29.7 SusWrite 31.1 23% 31.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.5 101% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3000 C16 Series 2x8GB 16,105 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	59.4% Above average	MC Read 23.6 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 22.6 62% 21.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 16.8 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 100%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 74%

Battleship

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	258x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	175x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	118x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	359x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	317x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	290x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $524

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16