To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics67% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191029
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 22 '21 at 10:44
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 92.8
2-Core 187
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 644
57% 481 Pts
64-Core 870
54% 870 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200
CLim: 1604 MHz, MLim: 2101 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67% Good
Lighting 88.2
Reflection 71.2
Parallax 112
72% 90.3 fps
MRender 71.7
Gravity 89.4
Splatting 55.3
58% 72.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
308GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 896 421 422 425 425 426 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 1379
Write 1,582
Mixed 1,174
SusWrite 502
260% 1,159 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 97.8
4K Mixed 46
158% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 581
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 456
338% 454 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 155%
Great: 237%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
50GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 103 26 131 23 23 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.5% Poor
Read 172
Write 97
Mixed 84.5
SusWrite 84.3
24% 109 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 18.2
4K Mixed 10.3
42% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 14.9
DQ Write 15.9
DQ Mixed 14.7
11% 15.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
465GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 120 123 123 123 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 118
Write 109
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 122
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24
462GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 110 112 111 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 109
Write 103
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 110
69% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSF1G72PZ-1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
MC Read 39
MC Write 37.7
MC Mixed 33.5
105% 36.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.8
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,559 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback