| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 4.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock J4105M (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180504 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 24 '21 at 14:31 |
| Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Celeron J4105
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
37.6%
Below average
|
38% 66.2 Pts
|
27% 204 Pts
|
10% 154 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F4) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.09
|
4.92%
Terrible
|
0% 12.2 fps
|
14% 17.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 128 142 150 137 133 MB/s
|
65%
Good
|
60% 83.4 MB/s
|
147% 1.1 MB/s
| |
|
Jmicron Generic 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 34 40 41 41 MB/s
|
14.5%
Very poor
|
19% 26 MB/s
|
106% 0.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
26.9%
Poor
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
15% 5.2 GB/s
|
20% 200 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical J4105M Builds (Compare 22 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock J4105M
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples | 14x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 2x |
| GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 23% - Poor | Total price: $30 |