Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics77.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z270X-Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory18.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170123
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateJan 25 '21 at 19:12
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 139
2-Core 235
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 554
62% 485 Pts
64-Core 566
35% 566 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.7% Very good
Lighting 95.3
Reflection 104
Parallax 96.8
78% 98.6 fps
MRender 93.3
Gravity 96
Splatting 95
78% 94.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ450000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 436
Write 308
Mixed 194
69% 313 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 14.9
64% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 79.1
DQ Write 68.3
DQ Mixed 41.4
40% 62.9 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 55%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
33GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 400 305 232 174 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 425
Mixed 384
SusWrite 271
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 48.4
164% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 355
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 101%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
108GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 109 100 94 91 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 132
Write 107
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 99.3
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
102GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 74 76 76 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 64.5
Write 63.5
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 76.1
47% 63.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 88%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
63GB free
Firmware: JA0OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 34 33 32 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 66.8
Write 32
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 33.4
30% 40.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X16GC3000C15K4 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
64% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 21.7
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 17.4
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 64%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 1,854 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $950
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback