Dell Precision WorkStation T5500

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	61.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	44.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Dell Precision WorkStation T5500 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0CRH6C
Memory	17.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130528
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 16 '17 at 02:05
Run Duration	826 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650 7,756 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 92.2 1-Core 74.3 2-Core 132 62% 99.4 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 572 51% 434 Pts	64-Core 1,042 64% 1,042 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6163) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Lighting 75.8 Reflection 75.1 Parallax 61.2 62% 70.7 fps	MRender 73.4 Gravity 73.3 Splatting 76.4 61% 74.4 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226 35,454 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 633GB free (System drive) Firmware: X411 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 12 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 9111 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 36 (A5) Unknown 100 100 27918679 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 68 (A8) Unknown 100 100 20 (A9) Unknown 100 100 1888 (AA) Unknown 100 100 12 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 2 (AE) Unknown 100 100 22 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 66 62 266289086498 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 420908630114 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 2414 (EA) Unknown 100 100 7042 (F1) Unknown 253 253 5613 (F2) Unknown 253 253 3351 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	44.7% Average	Read 260 Write 169 Mixed 159 43% 196 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 29.3 4K Mixed 14.4 60% 20.2 MB/s	DQ Read 167 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 37.8 54% 102 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 107%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159 43,620 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 171GB free Firmware: GM4O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 2 (02) Throughput performance 133 133 138 (03) Spinup time 117 117 25791234376 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 11017 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 6 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 129 129 30 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 52479 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 744 (C0) Power-off retract count 90 90 12482 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 90 90 12482 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 266288627746 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 6 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	49.6% Average	Read 85.9 Write 86.9 Mixed 25.9 48% 66.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.27 69% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 51%
ASMT ASM1352-PM 1TB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 926GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 30.1 Write 25.4 Mixed 11.8 27% 22.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.48 81% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 72%
HDD 1TB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 679GB free, PID 2551 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 29.7 Write 24.6 Mixed 25 33% 26.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.15 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.36 88% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 66%
ASMT ASM1352-PM 1TB 655GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	26.4% Poor	Read 23.2 Write 25.3 Mixed 16.1 27% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 5.65 4K Mixed 0.51 212% 2.27 MB/s

HDD 500GB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 300GB free, PID 2551 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 29.7 Write 24.4 Mixed 19 30% 24.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.29 4K Mixed 0.27 55% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 63%
SAMSUNG SP2514N 250GB 233GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.9% Very poor	Read 27.9 Write 24.9 Mixed 19.7 30% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.39 74% 0.9 MB/s

USB0909A Flash Disk 2GB 2GB free, PID 2092 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	4.29% Terrible	Read 16.3 Write 2.98 Mixed 4.98 8% 8.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.11 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 20% 1.72 MB/s

USB Flash Memory 8GB 2,269 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	5.58% Terrible	Read 21.9 Write 4.83 Mixed 7.39 11% 11.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.79 4K Write 0.07 4K Mixed 0.03 21% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.58% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 9 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR3 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	58.3% Above average	MC Read 27 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 25.3 64% 22.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 4.8 17% 6 GB/s	Latency 63.6 63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision WorkStation T5500 Builds (Compare 1,577 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T5500

CPU
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples	120x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	113x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples	96x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	84x
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	82x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	61x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	74x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	31x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	29x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	246x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	119x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	117x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16