EVOO EVC156-1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemEVOO EVC156-1  (all builds)
MotherboardEVOO EVOO
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200919
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '21 at 21:27
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6660U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 68.9
1-Core 94
2-Core 166
63% 110 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 283
38% 281 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Graphics 540
Device(1C6C 078B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
6.69% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 8.9
6% 8.27 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 8.3
Splatting 9.5
8% 9.13 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.69%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
W800s 256GB SSD 256GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0722A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 190 54 104 114 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 407
Write 284
Mixed 272
SusWrite 96
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 15.7
59% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 76.6
DQ Mixed 31.9
50% 97 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 81%
Seagate BUP Slim 250GB
105GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 32 28 31 30 31 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 38.9
Write 40.2
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 30.2
25% 34 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 46%
General USB Flash Disk 64GB
14GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 5.3 2.8 5.6 6.5 7.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
7.5% Terrible
Read 19.9
Write 13.9
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 6
18% 14 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.3
85% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.5%
Great: 42%
Philips USB Flash Drive 4GB
4GB free, PID 082b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.6 4.3 4.5 4.5 4.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
6.04% Terrible
Read 21.4
Write 4
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 4.4
9% 8.57 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
31% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.04%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
81% Excellent
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 48.1
MC Mixed 18.9
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 16
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 81%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EVC156-1 Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: EVOO EVC156-1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback