PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 8.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P7H55D-M EVO (all builds) |
Memory | 10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20100722 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Feb 21 '21 at 00:26 |
Run Duration | 245 Seconds |
Run User | BIH-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
62.8%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 5750
Sapphire(174B E138) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
|
8.45%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
717GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 102 128 137 136 135 MB/s
|
60.6%
Good
|
|||
37%
Below average
|
||||
44.1%
Average
|
||||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$51
193GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 104 129 140 139 140 MB/s
|
93.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
54.4%
Above average
|
||||
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
808GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 20 21 21 21 22 MB/s
|
12.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Disk drive 1TB
94GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 14 14 14 MB/s
|
11.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Disk drive 1TB
509GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 14 14 14 MB/s
|
8.27%
Terrible
|
|||
Disk drive 500GB
392GB free, PID 0200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 14 14 14 MB/s
|
13.2%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements 1TB
258GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 21 21 21 21 MB/s
|
14.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
38.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 21x |
Core i5-750Intel $75Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 14x |
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 11x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 13x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 7x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $518 |