Asrock H310CM-IB

Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battleship	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	70.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock H310CM-IB (all builds)
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190610
Uptime	10.9 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '21 at 01:35
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$295 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	Memory 87.6 1-Core 136 2-Core 269 91% 164 Pts	4-Core 554 8-Core 1,044 95% 799 Pts	64-Core 1,057 65% 1,057 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% MSI(1462 375C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	70.6% Very good	Lighting 88.4 Reflection 90.4 Parallax 82.3 72% 87 fps	MRender 94.4 Gravity 84.1 Splatting 73.9 68% 84.1 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 240GB 10,970 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: AP613PE0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 112 60 94 76 47 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	Read 278 Write 112 Mixed 361 SusWrite 85.8 47% 209 MB/s	4K Read 35 4K Write 75.6 4K Mixed 10.4 106% 40.3 MB/s	DQ Read 261 DQ Write 9.4 DQ Mixed 66.4 66% 112 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 95%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 438GB free Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 164 167 167 167 165 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	97.3% Outstanding	Read 173 Write 162 Mixed 97.2 SusWrite 166 110% 150 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 226% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 78.C1GS7.AUC0B 2x8GB 233 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.4% Very good	MC Read 30.1 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 22.7 77% 27 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 21.4 56% 19.6 GB/s	Latency 69.9 57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310CM-IB Builds (Compare 958 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-IB

CPU
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	330x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	290x
Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	253x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	276x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	249x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	178x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	106x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	106x
AS340 240GBApacerBench 71%, 10,970 samples	89x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	116x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	60x
D12.2356WS.001 1x8GBUnknownBench 44%, 565 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $243

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16