Medion MD34295

Performance Results


Gaming 141% UFO	Desktop 105% UFO	Workstation 154% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Medion MD34295 (all builds)
Motherboard	Micro-Star MPG Z490 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C79)
Memory	25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200804
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '21 at 20:18
Run Duration	260 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10900K-$440 107,269 User benchmarks, average bench 100% U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Memory 92.8 1-Core 159 2-Core 316 103% 190 Pts	4-Core 620 8-Core 1,227 109% 923 Pts	64-Core 2,076 128% 2,076 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 106%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466 261,508 User benchmarks, average bench 131% Zotac(19DA 9500) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	136% Outstanding	Lighting 186 Reflection 182 Parallax 188 151% 186 fps	MRender 206 Gravity 164 Splatting 134 134% 168 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 136% Great: 139%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
E12-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B27-BB1 1TB 394 User benchmarks, average bench 233% 808GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM22.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2018 996 1001 1000 1004 1009 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	235% Outstanding	Read 1,404 Write 2,221 Mixed 1,505 SusWrite 1,171 357% 1,575 MB/s	4K Read 41.8 4K Write 144 4K Mixed 67.9 227% 84.6 MB/s	DQ Read 948 DQ Write 714 DQ Mixed 813 613% 825 MB/s
Poor: 174% ↑ This bench: 235% Great: 263%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 898GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 147 147 146 146 147 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	85.5% Excellent	Read 153 Write 119 Mixed 35.6 SusWrite 145 82% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 107%
Generic MassStorageClass 8GB 113 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 1GB free, PID 0748, Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 10 11 8.9 10 7.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	6.68% Terrible	Read 19.9 Write 3.2 Mixed 8 SusWrite 9.4 12% 10.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 32% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.68% Great: 22%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 221GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 41 41 40 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Read 41 Write 39.7 Mixed 26.8 SusWrite 40.9 50% 37.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 44%
External USB3.0 DISK00 6TB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 3TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 24 22 22 18 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Read 45 Write 66.5 Mixed 35.5 SusWrite 24 58% 42.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.3 69% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 82%
External USB3.0 DISK01 6TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 5.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 178 180 177 178 178 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	66% Good	Read 105 Write 138 Mixed 72.9 SusWrite 178 174% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.8 160% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 71%
External USB3.0 DISK02 6TB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 5.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 178 180 177 178 178 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	70.1% Very good	Read 135 Write 147 Mixed 86.4 SusWrite 178 188% 137 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 0.6 152% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 31,785 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.3% Very good	MC Read 26.2 MC Write 29.3 MC Mixed 23.6 75% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 30.2 SC Mixed 23.8 67% 23.3 GB/s	Latency 62.5 64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MD34295 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 131%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 140%

UFO

System: Medion MD34295

CPU
Core i9-10900KIntel $440Bench 100%, 107,269 samples	14x

GPU
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	10x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	2x

SSD
E12-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B27-BB1 1TBBench 233%, 394 samples	8x
CT1000P 1TBNvmeBench 245%, 1,680 samples	4x
Samsung SSD 980 500GBNvmeBench 226%, 1,856 samples	1x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBKingstonBench 94%, 31,785 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $906

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16