Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	39.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171214
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Feb 27 '21 at 07:26
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7500-$89 149,467 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	77.3% Very good	Memory 82.8 1-Core 117 2-Core 223 79% 141 Pts	4-Core 414 8-Core 422 56% 418 Pts	64-Core 417 26% 417 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740 30,433 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Gigabyte(1458 36FF) 2GB CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	8.72% Terrible	Lighting 10 Reflection 12 Parallax 13 8% 11.7 fps	MRender 13.7 Gravity 12.1 Splatting 10.8 10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.72% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB 28,058 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 95 99 98 96 93 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 467 Write 432 Mixed 356 SusWrite 135 78% 347 MB/s	4K Read 40.1 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 54.7 189% 68.4 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 360 271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 122%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 507GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 157 157 157 157 157 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	87.8% Excellent	Read 149 Write 143 Mixed 93.3 SusWrite 157 100% 136 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.3 240% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 404GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 103 103 103 101 103 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Read 79.3 Write 75.6 Mixed 54.9 SusWrite 102 57% 77.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 204% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 109%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 3TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 161 160 161 162 162 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	92.9% Outstanding	Read 163 Write 154 Mixed 99.1 SusWrite 161 106% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 101%
WD My Book 1140 2TB 10,094 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1.5TB free, PID 1140 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	Read 39.3 Write 38 Mixed 28.7 SusWrite 40.8 50% 36.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.7 108% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-2400C15-8GVR F4-2400C15-8GVR F4-2400C15-16GVR F4-2400C15-16GVR 48GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 16384, 16384 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	MC Read 26.4 MC Write 31.9 MC Mixed 26.2 80% 28.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 32.6 SC Mixed 24 70% 24.6 GB/s	Latency 75.5 53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H270M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS - $110

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	294x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	211x
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	133x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	129x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	121x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	90x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	48x
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	36x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	49x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	32x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $377

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16