| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 81% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 46.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Dell Precision T1650 |
| Motherboard | Dell Precision T1650 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180628 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 27 '21 at 16:54 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | HRV-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
74.2%
Very good
|
74% 129 Pts
|
54% 427 Pts
|
31% 507 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Asus(1043 878E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
81%
Excellent
|
78% 112 fps
|
88% 110 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel 335 Series 180GB-$169
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 335u
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 17 130 MB/s
|
46.1%
Average
|
37% 168 MB/s
|
78% 27 MB/s
|
139% 190 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
533GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7D0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 141 155 155 154 155 MB/s
|
82.3%
Excellent
|
81% 112 MB/s
|
129% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M391B1G73BH0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
57.2%
Above average
|
56% 19.7 GB/s
|
52% 18.4 GB/s
|
54% 74.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Precision T1650 Builds (Compare 945 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Dell Precision T1650
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 307x |
| Xeon E3-1240 V2Intel $345Bench 71%, 4,997 samples | 147x |
| Xeon E3-1270 V2IntelBench 73%, 3,610 samples | 100x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 81x |
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 73x |
| Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples | 63x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $384 |