Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121115
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 01 '21 at 16:22
Run Duration	212 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4170 Quad-Core-$81 4,257 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	30% Poor	Memory 55.4 1-Core 21.1 2-Core 81.1 32% 52.5 Pts	4-Core 30.4 8-Core 24 4% 27.2 Pts	64-Core 43.3 3% 43.3 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 22,284 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Nvidia(10DE 145C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.2% Average	Lighting 57.9 Reflection 57.7 Parallax 51.5 47% 55.7 fps	MRender 63.2 Gravity 50.2 Splatting 51.1 44% 54.8 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0AB0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 121 92 98 91 80 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Read 412 Write 385 Mixed 317 SusWrite 115 69% 307 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 42.1 4K Mixed 29.7 98% 32.2 MB/s	DQ Read 244 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 164 136% 197 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 118%
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB-$80 4,893 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 64GB free Firmware: 2.22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 161 217 214 186 104 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Read 338 Write 267 Mixed 270 SusWrite 174 59% 262 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 37.1 4K Mixed 23.4 79% 26.7 MB/s	DQ Read 245 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 213 160% 215 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 91%
Adata SP900 256GB-$300 9,430 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 57GB free Firmware: 5.6.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 142 166 165 130 97 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Read 344 Write 246 Mixed 238 SusWrite 143 54% 243 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 47 4K Mixed 23.3 82% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 94.8 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 163 118% 149 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 89%
Toshiba MK1059GS 1TB 144 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 844GB free Firmware: GU00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 98 106 104 74 24 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 25% Great: 50%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB 3,958 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 40GB free, PID 5590 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 9.4 14 15 17 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 29.5 Write 16 Mixed 15.5 SusWrite 13.6 23% 18.6 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1.9 120% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB 3,407 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.1% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 12.5 28% 9.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 1.9 11% 3.93 GB/s	Latency 142 28% 142 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	564x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $610

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16