Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	26.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600S-$235 3,026 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	62.6% Good	Memory 89.3 1-Core 85.5 2-Core 148 66% 108 Pts	4-Core 196 8-Core 334 32% 265 Pts	64-Core 348 22% 348 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.9% Poor	Lighting 33.9 Reflection 37.5 Parallax 36.3 28% 35.9 fps	MRender 34.2 Gravity 36.7 Splatting 25.1 26% 32 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB 14,997 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP2OA41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 9.7 10 15 19 25 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,384 Write 5.7 SusWrite 14 334% 468 MB/s	4K Read 186 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.4 7,812% 62.4 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 76%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 12,078 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 436GB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 23 23 24 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 30 Write 20.2 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 23.6 31% 23.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173BH0-CK0 Kingston KVT8FP-HYC M378B5273CH0-CK0 Kingston KVT8FP-HYC 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.2% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 14.8 44% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 14.2 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 68.1 59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	766x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	324x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	302x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	67x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	60x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	60x

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $225

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16