Gigabyte Z490 AORUS ELITE AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte Z490 AORUS ELITE AC  (all builds)
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '21 at 22:18
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700KF-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 245
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 877
81% 678 Pts
64-Core 1,320
82% 1,320 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (162 fps cap detected)
121% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 163
Parallax 162
132% 162 fps
MRender 162
Gravity 141
Splatting 125
115% 143 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 121%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1566 989 879 826 788 754 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 2,485
Write 2,341
Mixed 1,722
SusWrite 967
420% 1,879 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 74.1
247% 85 MB/s
DQ Read 937
DQ Write 649
DQ Mixed 827
608% 804 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 270%
Great: 410%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
146GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 184 82 83 82 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 485
Mixed 415
SusWrite 166
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 90.4
4K Mixed 44
153% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 353
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 121%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
256GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 480 479 482 481 480 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 486
Mixed 461
SusWrite 481
109% 484 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 52.1
172% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 356
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 119%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 102 117 109 86 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 87.5
Write 102
Mixed 70
SusWrite 98.6
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
87% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 90%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95
2.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 182 180 184 182 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 163
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 181
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 101%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 25.4
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 38.3
SC Mixed 26.3
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z490 AORUS ELITE AC Builds (Compare 3,563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z490 AORUS ELITE AC - $241

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $1,028
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback