Performance Results


Gaming 150% UFO	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 170% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	179% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	16.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200813
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Mar 03 '21 at 02:36
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	63%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	85.8% Excellent	Memory 65.5 1-Core 144 2-Core 290 87% 166 Pts	4-Core 568 8-Core 988 94% 778 Pts	64-Core 1,963 122% 1,963 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% EVGA(3842 3885) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	179% Outstanding	Lighting 256 Reflection 241 Parallax 268 208% 255 fps	MRender 304 Gravity 214 Splatting 164 179% 227 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 179% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 325GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 848 790 798 750 783 740 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	243% Outstanding	Read 1,938 Write 2,235 Mixed 1,438 SusWrite 785 359% 1,599 MB/s	4K Read 56.8 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 53.8 228% 82.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,196 DQ Write 1,008 DQ Mixed 1,111 830% 1,105 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 243% Great: 355%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 860 1TB 441 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 388GB free Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 339 399 329 371 334 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Read 390 Write 427 Mixed 330 SusWrite 358 85% 376 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 33.3 4K Mixed 15.6 68% 23.1 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 217 DQ Mixed 106 97% 143 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 95%
Amd-raid Array 1 4TB 1,316 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 2.5TB free Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 159 161 164 163 164 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	Read 159 Write 154 Mixed 113 SusWrite 162 108% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.2 122% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 207%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$68 86,372 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.4% Good	MC Read 27.3 MC Write 23.8 MC Mixed 24.1 72% 25.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 19.8 49% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 113 36% 113 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 111%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	784x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	726x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	656x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	616x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	434x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	400x

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $857

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16