Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.54% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0-$1,335 868 User benchmarks, average bench 74% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 76.3 1-Core 88.6 2-Core 177 66% 114 Pts	4-Core 354 8-Core 620 59% 487 Pts	64-Core 900 56% 900 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000 8,609 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.62 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.54% Terrible	Lighting 8.3 Reflection 17.2 Parallax 10.9 7% 12.1 fps	MRender 16 Gravity 7.1 Splatting 10.6 9% 11.2 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.54% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 500GB 2,934 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 282GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 309 307 311 308 308 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Read 467 Write 220 Mixed 240 SusWrite 302 68% 308 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 36 4K Mixed 23.8 83% 27.2 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 220 DQ Mixed 166 141% 206 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 118%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB 7,734 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 5.5TB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	Read 30.7 Write 26.6 Mixed 27.6 SusWrite 27.1 38% 28 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 1 186% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 86%
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB 754 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 3GB free, PID 5530 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 5.3 5.6 5.4 4.6 5.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	4.72% Terrible	Read 16.1 Write 2 Mixed 2 SusWrite 5 6% 6.28 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 20% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.72% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung-00CE M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B2G70QH0-YK0 M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B2G70QH0-YK0 M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B2G70QH0-YK0 M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B2G70QH0-YK0 96GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	84.7% Excellent	MC Read 38.1 MC Write 33.4 MC Mixed 31.4 98% 34.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 7.4 25% 8.6 GB/s	Latency 87.7 46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 96%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 58%

Gunboat

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	96x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	82x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	62x

RAM
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	41x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 79%, 545 samples	39x
M393B1G70BH0-YK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 67%, 378 samples	24x

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $170

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16