HP Compaq nw9440 (RB552UA#ABA)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Compaq nw9440 (RB552UA#ABA)  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 309F
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '17 at 03:04
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 T7400-$110
U10, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
35.3% Below average
Memory 63.5
1-Core 22.7
2-Core 40.7
31% 42.3 Pts
4-Core 44.8
8-Core 44.7
6% 44.8 Pts
64-Core 45.2
3% 45.2 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1500M
HP(103C 309F) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dum Ver. 7.15.10.9806
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
0.52% Terrible
Lighting 0.97
Reflection 0.65
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.71 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.52%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS721010G9SA00 100GB-$30
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MCZOC12V Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 28.5
Mixed 10.8
17% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 0.81
4K Mixed 0.25
62% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 3.2
9% 3.2 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback