Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6820HQ 33,920 User benchmarks, average bench 60% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 85.2 1-Core 97.8 2-Core 188 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 361 8-Core 466 53% 413 Pts	64-Core 542 34% 542 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M1000M 6,377 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Legend(17AA 2230) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 369.49 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Lighting 15.9 Reflection 16.5 Parallax 16.1 13% 16.2 fps	MRender 21.8 Gravity 14.5 Splatting 14.7 14% 17 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 14%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN512HAJQ-000L7 512GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT24L6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 411 Write 217 Mixed 327 70% 318 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 59.6 4K Mixed 36.6 122% 41.7 MB/s	DQ Read 355 DQ Write 304 DQ Mixed 322 243% 327 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 119%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB 71,691 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 27.6 MC Mixed 20.8 72% 25.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 25.9 SC Mixed 20.4 59% 20.6 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 79%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-6820HQIntelBench 60%, 33,920 samples	16x

GPU
Quadro M1000MNvidiaBench 13%, 6,377 samples	9x
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	7x

SSD
SD8TN8U512G1001 512GBSandiskBench 76%, 568 samples	8x
THNSNJ512GDNU A 512GBToshibaBench 76%, 572 samples	3x
THNSNJ512GDNU 512GBToshibaBench 80%, 225 samples	1x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	5x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH Samsung M474A2K43BB1-CRC HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 32GBHynixBench 66%, 4 samples	3x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16