HP 255 G2 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop 4%
Tree trunk
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 6.73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemHP 255 G2 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2192
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '21 at 16:07
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD E1-2100 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
6.73% Terrible
Memory 7.79
1-Core 17.2
2-Core 34.6
11% 19.9 Pts
4-Core 32.5
8-Core 34.8
5% 33.7 Pts
64-Core 33.5
2% 33.5 Pts
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.73%
Great: 26%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD HD 8210
HP(103C 2192) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 18.9.3
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
1.19% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 1.3
2% 1.93 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 2.1
1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.19%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK6459GSXP 640GB
584GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GN00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 66 69 58 71 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 57.9
Write 64.3
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 60.1
38% 52 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 1334 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 4
11% 3.77 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 0.8
7% 2.37 GB/s
Latency 425
9% 425 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 255 G2 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 20%
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 255 G2 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $22
The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $245Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback