Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 7,962 User benchmarks, average bench 77% LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Memory 87.2 1-Core 105 2-Core 204 76% 132 Pts	4-Core 419 8-Core 674 67% 546 Pts	64-Core 853 53% 853 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820 7,330 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Nvidia(10DE 1096) ≥ 4GB Ram: 4GB, Driver: 342.00 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	21.6% Poor	Lighting 24.5 Reflection 29 Parallax 34.6 20% 29.4 fps	MRender 38.9 Gravity 25.8 Splatting 27.7 25% 30.8 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 22%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon IT LCS-128L9S-HP 128GB 2,338 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: 9C08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 292 285 292 277 244 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	79.1% Very good	Read 431 Write 318 Mixed 256 SusWrite 275 72% 320 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 63.9 4K Mixed 28.2 110% 39.4 MB/s	DQ Read 320 DQ Write 204 DQ Mixed 176 154% 233 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1B1 32GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 16384 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	69.2% Good	MC Read 30.1 MC Write 21.7 MC Mixed 23.1 71% 25 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 20.3 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 70%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

CPU
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	1x

SSD
240GB SATA SSD 240GBPNYBench 71%, 495 samples	1x

RAM
M391A2K43BB1-CRC 2x16GBSamsungBench 80%, 230 samples	1x

Value: 6% - Terrible

Total price: $820

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16