MSI FM2-A75IA-E53 (MS-7792)

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	MSI MS-7792
Motherboard	MSI FM2-A75IA-E53 (MS-7792) (all builds)
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140121
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Mar 16 '21 at 21:32
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119 18,312 User benchmarks, average bench 50% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Memory 89.9 1-Core 70.3 2-Core 130 61% 96.9 Pts	4-Core 223 8-Core 214 30% 219 Pts	64-Core 214 13% 214 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203 42,130 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 2554) 2GB CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.2.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Lighting 38.7 Reflection 38.3 Parallax 45.2 32% 40.7 fps	MRender 32.5 Gravity 34.8 Splatting 27.1 25% 31.5 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB 36,832 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA15.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 88 59 110 62 57 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	68.6% Good	Read 429 Write 240 Mixed 320 SusWrite 86.2 60% 269 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 66.1 4K Mixed 29.8 119% 42.1 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 241 DQ Mixed 44.9 83% 163 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 90%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42 12,070 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 130GB free Firmware: CP100-12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 65 64 64 64 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 54.6 Write 71.4 Mixed 46.6 SusWrite 64.1 44% 59.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 43%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 112GB free Firmware: 3.AAF SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 72 73 74 74 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	40.3% Average	Read 68 Write 41.2 Mixed 41.8 SusWrite 72.2 41% 55.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 1 KHX1866C10D3/4G 3 KHX1866C10D3/4G 8GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1866, 1866 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	38.4% Below average	MC Read 18.8 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 12.6 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 11 29% 10 GB/s	Latency 67.3 59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 38%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2-A75IA-E53 (MS-7792) Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI FM2-A75IA-E53 (MS-7792)

CPU
A6-5400K APUAMD $120Bench 40%, 7,836 samples	3x
A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $130Bench 50%, 12,547 samples	2x
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 670Nvidia $435Bench 28%, 47,610 samples	1x
Radeon HD 7540DAMDBench 3%, 4,337 samples	1x
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	1x

SSD
840 250GBSamsung $251Bench 70%, 41,998 samples	1x
BX200 240GBCrucial $36Bench 76%, 36,559 samples	1x
Fury 120GBHyperX $160Bench 64%, 11,403 samples	1x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 1x4GBKingstonBench 28%, 5,300 samples	1x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	1x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 50%, 27,024 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 17% - Very poor

Total price: $806

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16