Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Extracomputer GB-BXCE-3205 (all builds)
Motherboard	GIGABYTE MQLPCAP-00
Memory	2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150831
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 22 '21 at 09:10
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 3205U 915 User benchmarks, average bench 40% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	46.5% Average	Memory 76.7 1-Core 48.9 2-Core 93.9 47% 73.2 Pts	4-Core 98.6 8-Core 95.7 13% 97.1 Pts	64-Core 97.3 6% 97.3 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 3,725 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Gigabyte(1458 1000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	0.63% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 3.4 0% 1.77 fps	MRender 3.8 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 0.3 2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.63% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X300 128GB-$170 2,748 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: X3540000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 141 92 111 62 82 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Read 458 Write 222 Mixed 159 SusWrite 108 52% 236 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 82.5 4K Mixed 38.2 143% 51.4 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 203 DQ Mixed 36.1 81% 168 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5469-051.A00LF 1x4GB 334 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	31.4% Below average	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 11.3 MC Mixed 9.3 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 10.3 26% 9.23 GB/s	Latency 86.9 46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16