Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Memory 93.3 1-Core 84.2 2-Core 167 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 291 8-Core 372 42% 331 Pts	64-Core 373 23% 373 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Nvidia(10DE 0000) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 340.52 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.86% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.9 Parallax 0.8 2% 1.97 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 2.1 2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.86% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03150002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 54 56 54 54 55 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.1% Below average	Read 191 Write 62 Mixed 78.5 SusWrite 57.1 21% 97.1 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 38.8 4K Mixed 19.7 66% 24 MB/s	DQ Read 33.8 DQ Write 67.9 DQ Mixed 25.8 27% 42.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M378B5773CH0-CK0 802C0000802C 4JTF25664AZ-1G6E1 802C0000802C 4JTF25664AZ-1G6E1 802C0000802C 4JTF25664AZ-1G6E1 8GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.5% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 11.7 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 12.4 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 61.5 65% 61.5 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon HD 4550ATIBench 1%, 3,005 samples	72x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	71x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	69x

RAM
M378B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBUnknownBench 37%, 202 samples	16x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 4x2GBUnknownBench 36%, 633 samples	15x
KP223C-ELD 4x2GBUnknownBench 35%, 110 samples	15x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $128

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16