CMS 7200-5401A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCMS 7200-5401A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME A320M-K
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 30 '21 at 01:38
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD A10-9700 APU (2016 M.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 69.1
1-Core 69.8
2-Core 151
57% 96.5 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 289
38% 279 Pts
64-Core 288
19% 288 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 58%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$70
904GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 57 46 52 60 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 52.3
Write 73.2
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 51.9
38% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.2
44% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown CT4G4DFS824A.C8FBD2 CT4G4DFS824A.C8FF 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.5% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 13.3
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 8
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 7200-5401A Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: CMS 7200-5401A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $50
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback