Asus P7H57D-V EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P7H57D-V EVO  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100813
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 04 '21 at 11:41
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 680-$300
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 66.4
1-Core 93
2-Core 151
60% 103 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 238
30% 231 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720
Nvidia(10DE 1087) 1GB
CLim: 967 MHz, MLim: 500 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
6.01% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 5.9
Parallax 9.1
6% 7.53 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 8
Splatting 7.2
6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.01%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 104 36 37 38 37 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.7% Below average
Read 248
Write 137
Mixed 159
SusWrite 63.4
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 26.5
4K Mixed 23.8
77% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 32.7
DQ Write 50.9
DQ Mixed 38.1
30% 40.6 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 118%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
305GB free
Firmware: JP4OA39C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 43.7
Write 12
Mixed 18.4
SusWrite 12.9
16% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
103% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 74%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 172
Write 172
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 13
72% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 108%
Seagate ST3200822AS 200GB-$33
24GB free
Firmware: 3.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 35
Write 13.7
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 39.9
21% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.6% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 10.7
27% 9.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 8.6
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7H57D-V EVO Builds (Compare 143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P7H57D-V EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $310
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $183Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback