Asus F5R

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 7.58%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
SystemAsus F5R  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK F5R
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20071221
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 02 '17 at 18:16
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel T2250
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
7.58% Terrible
SC Int 34.5
SC Float 16.8
SC Mixed 22.3
20% 24.5 Pts
QC Int 40.2
QC Float 32.9
QC Mixed 17.7
7% 30.3 Pts
MC Int 70.2
MC Float 33.1
MC Mixed 45.7
8% 49.7 Pts
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.58%
Great: 12%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Asus(1043 1402) 128MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.342.0.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.5
0% 0.5 fps
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST9160821AS 160GB-$30
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.ALC Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 24.9
Write 23.9
Mixed 14
16% 20.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 0.55
4K Mixed 0.19
48% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
7.77% Terrible
MC Read 2.8
MC Write 1.4
MC Mixed 1.9
6% 2.03 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2
6% 2.27 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.77%
Great: 22%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical F5R Builds (Compare 0 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%

System: Asus F5R

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $380Nvidia GTX 1070 $345Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $98
Intel Core i7-7700K $350AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $147SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback