| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 1.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 76.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
| System | Dell Latitude E6520 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Dell 0J4TFW |
| Memory | 5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20131114 |
| Uptime | 10.7 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 10 '21 at 05:00 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70%
Good
|
66% 110 Pts
|
43% 342 Pts
|
25% 399 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Dell(1028 0494) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
|
1.98%
Terrible
|
2% 2.23 fps
|
2% 2.87 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 146 59 52 50 49 MB/s
|
76.8%
Very good
|
75% 335 MB/s
|
111% 35.8 MB/s
|
217% 325 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Ultra 16GB
14GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 8.9 7.7 7.9 8.3 7.8 MB/s
|
11.3%
Very poor
|
21% 17.6 MB/s
|
117% 2.6 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston TSB1600D3S11ELD/4G Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
50%
Average
|
49% 17.1 GB/s
|
42% 14.9 GB/s
|
57% 70 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Latitude E6520 Builds (Compare 1,115 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Dell Latitude E6520
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2520MIntel $34Bench 48%, 45,308 samples | 315x |
| Core i7-2760QMIntel $130Bench 60%, 10,423 samples | 184x |
| Core i5-2540MIntel $315Bench 52%, 16,964 samples | 144x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples | 715x |
| NVS 4200MNvidiaBench 2%, 6,825 samples | 298x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 96x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $62 |