Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 203%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 199%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics188% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive362% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory29.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '21 at 19:49
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700KF-$280
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 97.4
1-Core 159
2-Core 319
105% 192 Pts
4-Core 651
8-Core 1,314
116% 983 Pts
64-Core 1,291
80% 1,291 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 110%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.3.2
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
188% Outstanding
Lighting 241
Reflection 256
Parallax 482
196% 326 fps
MRender 388
Gravity 201
Splatting 289
238% 293 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 188%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1307 1670 1664 1537 1359 1323 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
362% Outstanding
Read 2,653
Write 2,481
Mixed 1,835
SusWrite 1,477
473% 2,111 MB/s
4K Read 68.8
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 91.7
305% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,759
DQ Write 1460
DQ Mixed 1,476
1,142% 1,565 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 362%
Great: 372%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 85 86 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 130
Write 118
Mixed 77.4
SusWrite 84.2
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.8
174% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 83%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 158 155 153 153 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 144
Write 151
Mixed 88.7
SusWrite 155
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.2
322% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 105%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
148GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 57 60 59 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 64.3
Write 59.4
Mixed 41.2
SusWrite 58.6
41% 55.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
88% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
332GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 73 73 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 155
Write 143
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 72.7
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 101%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
186GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 64 65 67 68 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 128
Write 124
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 65.5
72% 98 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 49.1
MC Write 51.6
MC Mixed 40.5
134% 47.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 52.4
SC Mixed 36.4
107% 37.3 GB/s
Latency 48.8
82% 48.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 130%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 15,207 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI - $176

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $796
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback