Asus B75M-A

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus B75M-A (all builds)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130217
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 15 '21 at 14:52
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	BOL-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3330 51,926 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	67.3% Good	Memory 81.1 1-Core 82.3 2-Core 165 64% 110 Pts	4-Core 319 8-Core 268 40% 294 Pts	64-Core 302 19% 302 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.22 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.32% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 4 Parallax 4.1 3% 4.03 fps	MRender 3.5 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 4.9 3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.32% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ct240bx5 CT240BX50 240GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 117GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6C SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 203 14 112 65 66 MB/s Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.3% Average	Read 247 Write 226 Mixed 225 SusWrite 94.8 44% 198 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 62 4K Mixed 19.3 82% 32.4 MB/s	DQ Read 208 DQ Write 7.8 DQ Mixed 0.5 27% 72.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 84%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 414GB free Firmware: MX4O SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 95 90 96 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Read 94.3 Write 98.3 Mixed 11 SusWrite 94.4 54% 74.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 170% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 108%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 216GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 86 87 87 88 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Read 123 Write 121 Mixed 58 SusWrite 86.6 71% 97.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 12GB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	45.6% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 14.8 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 14.4 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 78.5 51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B75M-A Builds (Compare 619 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B75M-A - $110

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	108x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	88x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	53x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	76x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	54x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	37x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	14x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	13x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	15x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	13x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $435

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16