Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive343% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
20 days ago, 20 days ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 17 '21 at 15:42
Run Duration365 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$361
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Memory 84.8
1-Core 136
2-Core 272
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 949
93% 740 Pts
64-Core 1,442
97% 1,442 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 87C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4104 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 185
Parallax 167
141% 175 fps
MRender 215
Gravity 130
Splatting 122
116% 156 fps
Poor: 124%
This bench: 129%
Great: 167%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1775 2342 2379 2312 489 495 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
343% Outstanding
Read 2,299
Write 2,195
Mixed 1,984
SusWrite 1632
456% 2,027 MB/s
4K Read 57.1
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 84.8
303% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,434
DQ Write 1,156
DQ Mixed 1,294
969% 1,295 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 343%
Great: 386%
Seagate BarraCuda Q1 SSD ZA480CV10001 480GB
319GB free
Firmware: STWSN010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 422 430 436 435 436 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 362
Write 433
Mixed 360
SusWrite 428
90% 396 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 36.7
136% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 145
120% 170 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$58
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 131 140 139 137 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
79% Very good
Read 140
Write 125
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 135
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$58
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 114 117 118 116 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 120
Write 109
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 115
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
178GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 184 188 188 188 188 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 124
Mixed 72.4
SusWrite 185
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 105%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$68
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 157 158 160 160 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 156
Write 120
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 157
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$145
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 161 170 157 162 171 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 48.4
Write 88.3
Mixed 61.1
SusWrite 160
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.5
188% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$190
6TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 171 178 173 174 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 122
Write 134
Mixed 71.9
SusWrite 174
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.8
259% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 93%
SABRENT 1TB
742GB free
Firmware: RKT343.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2485 2473 1678 1139 1133 1117 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
0GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 130
Write 26.1
Mixed 43.2
66% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 3.8
248% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 39%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 34.8
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 36.4
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 72.1
55% 72.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 20,790 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $178

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,157
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $196Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $50
Intel Core i5-11600K $255Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $216Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $102SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback