Asrock X370 Professional Gaming

Performance Results


Gaming 91% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 94% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Professional Gaming (all builds)
Memory	58.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170512
Uptime	8.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 07 '17 at 19:55
Run Duration	198 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Memory 70.8 1-Core 107 2-Core 199 70% 126 Pts	4-Core 366 8-Core 687 63% 527 Pts	64-Core 1,217 75% 1,217 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 82%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 853F) CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.7% Average	Lighting 54.2 Reflection 67.4 Parallax 56.3 44% 59.3 fps	MRender 71.1 Gravity 55.7 Splatting 54.5 49% 60.4 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 54%
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2775 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	128% Outstanding	Lighting 176 Reflection 202 Parallax 197 143% 191 fps	MRender 132 Gravity 185 Splatting 127 120% 148 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249 18,356 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 635GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	246% Outstanding	Read 1,934 Write 1,777 Mixed 1,551 391% 1,754 MB/s	4K Read 41.8 4K Write 77.9 4K Mixed 51.3 170% 57 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 81.3 81% 133 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 246% Great: 363%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 385GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 915 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 33 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 61 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1461011978	94.5% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 413 Mixed 410 99% 444 MB/s	4K Read 38.5 4K Write 55 4K Mixed 38 136% 43.8 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 67.7 74% 126 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 134%
Seagate NAS HDD 2TB-$98 3,967 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 1TB free Firmware: SC60 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 173894752 (03) Spinup time 98 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 928 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 66 60 4007553 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7375 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 54 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 91 91 9 (BE) vendor-specific 71 63 487981085 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 17 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1017 (C2) HDA temperature 29 40 42949672989 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	77% Very good	Read 142 Write 127 Mixed 128 99% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.17 60% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88 40,945 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 878GB free Firmware: CC1H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 218928042 (03) Spinup time 92 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10775 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 15 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 85420037 (09) Power-on hours count 31 31 61057 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 8 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 232 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 262148 (BD) vendor-specific 24 24 76 (BE) vendor-specific 67 44 120898060321 (C2) HDA temperature 33 56 38654705697 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 39 28 218928042 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -84112639486543 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2848748772 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1250868017	50.9% Above average	Read 105 Write 72.5 Mixed 86.5 66% 87.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.22 4K Mixed 0.3 78% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB 172 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.9% Good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 24.6 MC Mixed 22.8 71% 24.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.9 SC Write 24.8 SC Mixed 21.1 61% 21.3 GB/s	Latency 99.4 40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 145%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Professional Gaming Builds (Compare 125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 92%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 90%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Professional Gaming

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	25x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	19x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	14x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	19x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	13x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	11x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 241%, 38,097 samples	6x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
MX300 SATA M.2 1TBCrucial $65Bench 90%, 6,111 samples	4x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	7x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	5x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $738

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16