Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Memory 89.3 1-Core 119 2-Core 228 83% 146 Pts	4-Core 348 8-Core 451 51% 399 Pts	64-Core 458 28% 458 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2200 2,904 User benchmarks, average bench 19% MSI(1462 115A) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6231 Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Lighting 15.5 Reflection 28 Parallax 21.3 13% 21.6 fps	MRender 28.8 Gravity 17.8 Splatting 17.8 17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 20%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS128G39MNC-3510A 256GB 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAV2100Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 294 295 289 289 283 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 460 Write 417 Mixed 374 SusWrite 303 87% 389 MB/s	4K Read 46.2 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 59.6 205% 72.2 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 357 270% 361 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB 55,289 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	MC Read 27.3 MC Write 28.3 MC Mixed 23.5 75% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 24.3 67% 23.4 GB/s	Latency 68.1 59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 76%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	935x
GTX 960MNvidiaBench 16%, 73,363 samples	501x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	90x

SSD
THNSNJ128G8NY 128GBToshibaBench 73%, 7,789 samples	150x
MTS800 M.2 128GBTranscend $126Bench 69%, 5,326 samples	55x
HFS128G39MNC-3510A 128GBBench 79%, 2,005 samples	32x

RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples	280x
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 38%, 45,898 samples	237x
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 35%, 32,056 samples	171x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16