| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20141202 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 02 '21 at 13:14 |
| Run Duration | 915 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 9% |
PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61.5%
Good
|
57% 94.9 Pts
|
40% 326 Pts
|
21% 344 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Asus(1043 8797) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.27
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
33.7%
Below average
|
6% 80.3 fps
|
87% 109 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 79 80 80 64 MB/s
|
30.3%
Below average
|
27% 120 MB/s
|
61% 20.1 MB/s
|
22% 31.2 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
769GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 80 80 80 72 MB/s
|
40.1%
Average
|
47% 63.5 MB/s
|
156% 0.97 MB/s
| |
|
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
320GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 61 60 62 63 61 MB/s
|
33.4%
Below average
|
42% 57 MB/s
|
124% 0.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
44.9%
Average
|
47% 16.3 GB/s
|
28% 9.8 GB/s
|
46% 86.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A78L-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,858 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 - $53
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 508x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 325x |
| FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 185x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 139x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 127x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 90x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $128 |