Jumper EZbook

Performance Results

Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop 18%
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemJumper EZbook  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201229
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '21 at 18:01
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Celeron J3455
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Memory 7.96
1-Core 40.6
2-Core 78.5
21% 42.4 Pts
4-Core 89.2
8-Core 118
14% 104 Pts
64-Core 121
8% 121 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Device(1E63 002E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.79% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1
Parallax 1.3
1% 1.07 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.79%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS512GMTS430S 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: 02J0TBD1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 231 204 187 193 190 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 323
Write 308
Mixed 286
SusWrite 208
63% 281 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 19.8
73% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 101
96% 150 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x3GB
2 of 2 slots used
6GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.6 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 2.7
8% 2.73 GB/s
Latency 423
10% 423 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical EZbook Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop 30%
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Jumper EZbook

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback