Razer Blade

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH530
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 03 '21 at 08:55
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 107
2-Core 200
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 508
54% 431 Pts
64-Core 610
38% 610 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2005) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.95% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 9.7
Parallax 8.5
5% 8.1 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 10.5
8% 9.5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.95%
Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 2080 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2005) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 462.59
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.7% Above average
Lighting 73.4
Reflection 68.2
Parallax 68.2
60% 69.9 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 58.2
Splatting 51.9
60% 76.5 fps
Poor: 73%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1775
Write 1,790
Mixed 1,258
358% 1,608 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 70.3
232% 77 MB/s
DQ Read 796
DQ Write 582
DQ Mixed 693
517% 690 MB/s
Poor: 167% Great: 297%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 262GB
80GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 32 30 32 28 31 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.6% Very poor
Read 33.1
Write 44.9
Mixed 40.9
SusWrite 31.1
28% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 7.1
1,174% 6.77 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
79.1% Very good
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 23
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 23.8
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,018 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback