| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 57.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 18.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H61M-E (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130204 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 05 '21 at 17:44 |
| Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 44% |
PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.3%
Very good
|
77% 132 Pts
|
39% 293 Pts
|
18% 292 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
57.7%
Above average
|
58% 75.5 fps
|
57% 70.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$42
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF300000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 52 44 69 64 63 MB/s
|
18.1%
Very poor
|
22% 98.2 MB/s
|
26% 8.93 MB/s
|
22% 35.2 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
930GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 209 213 209 212 211 MB/s
|
113%
Outstanding
|
111% 152 MB/s
|
157% 1.2 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB
13GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 20 19 19 MB/s
|
13.9%
Very poor
|
29% 22.4 MB/s
|
124% 1.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 04CB MI64C1D1629Z1 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
57.8%
Above average
|
58% 20.2 GB/s
|
47% 16.4 GB/s
|
60% 66.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-E Builds (Compare 1,059 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H61M-E - $76
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 156x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 118x |
| Core i3-3240IntelBench 55%, 37,789 samples | 111x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 165x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 62x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 50x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $163 |