Toshiba QOSMIO X770

Performance Results

Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop 63%
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive94.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemToshiba QOSMIO X770  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111222
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 06 '21 at 17:50
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User MUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 75
2-Core 139
62% 99.7 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 286
36% 266 Pts
64-Core 285
19% 285 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M
Toshiba(1179 FC01) 1.5GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver.
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
6.59% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 4.7
6% 7.53 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 8.9
Splatting 8.4
7% 9.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.59%
Great: 8%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN1T0HMJP-00000 1TB
534GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV0100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 408 425 420 418 419 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 416
Mixed 378
SusWrite 414
93% 411 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 35.5
114% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 367
276% 369 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 14.8
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 48%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical QOSMIO X770 Builds (Compare 128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop 57%
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba QOSMIO X770

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $228
The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback