HP ProDesk 400 G6 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G6 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 859B
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200730
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '21 at 12:54
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-9500
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 67.4
1-Core 120
2-Core 241
79% 143 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 660
73% 562 Pts
64-Core 687
46% 687 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
HP(103C 859B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
5.17% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 6.9
5% 6.37 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 6.6
6% 7.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.17%
Great: 7%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Liteon CL1-8D256-HP 256GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: L182
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,497
Write 1,034
Mixed 903
253% 1,145 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 21.3
114% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 645
DQ Write 740
DQ Mixed 436
400% 607 MB/s
Poor: 86% Great: 163%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$34
931GB free
Firmware: HPH5
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 189
Write 109
Mixed 81.5
94% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 114%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HP26D4U9S8MD-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
39% Below average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 11.7
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 8.7
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ProDesk 400 G6 SFF Builds (Compare 309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop 80%
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G6 SFF

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback