Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209 69,603 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Memory 53.2 1-Core 20.7 2-Core 36.8 27% 36.9 Pts	4-Core 71.9 8-Core 106 11% 88.8 Pts	64-Core 124 8% 124 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 71%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDMCEAW080A4 mS 11GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 10GB free Firmware: LG7i SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 48 44 53 55 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Read 308 Write 91.1 Mixed 131 SusWrite 53.4 32% 146 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 30.2 4K Mixed 19.4 68% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 82.6 DQ Write 99.8 DQ Mixed 60.3 54% 80.9 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 61%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$65 16,938 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 659GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 41 43 45 59 68 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 28% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 4x4GB 1,119 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	41.3% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 16 46% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 6.9 16% 5.63 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	626x
GTX 770MNvidiaBench 16%, 6,357 samples	119x
GTX 880MNvidiaBench 28%, 2,147 samples	99x

SSD
DMT-80M6M-11 mSATA 80GBLiteonitBench 67%, 888 samples	68x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	36x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	36x

RAM
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 53%, 1,671 samples	113x
8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 4x4GBMicronBench 53%, 1,119 samples	80x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 53%, 1,523 samples	64x

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $209

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16