Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 20% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4115 544 User benchmarks, average bench 34% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Memory 17.8 1-Core 40 2-Core 47.6 20% 35.1 Pts	4-Core 73.3 8-Core 118 12% 95.7 Pts	64-Core 120 7% 120 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.48% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 2.4 Parallax 1.6 1% 1.77 fps	MRender 4.5 Gravity 1.5 Splatting 2.6 2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.48% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
NT-256 256GB 1,342 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 210GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 347 333 331 339 340 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Read 338 Write 312 Mixed 265 SusWrite 341 71% 314 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 65.9 4K Mixed 12.7 74% 31.1 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 296 DQ Mixed 29.1 73% 148 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 4.4 16% 5.5 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 2.8 9% 3 GB/s	Latency 337 12% 337 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	485x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	478x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	457x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,363x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	486x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	354x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16