Asrock N68C-GS FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68C-GS FX  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '21 at 14:52
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
48.7% Average
Memory 67.4
1-Core 42.6
2-Core 83.2
42% 64.4 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 227
25% 196 Pts
64-Core 249
15% 249 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 941 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 16.5
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 21.9
13% 18.6 fps
MRender 21.5
Gravity 21.5
Splatting 16.2
16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon I T LCS-128L9S 128GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9C08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 160 162 161 167 164 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.5% Below average
Read 190
Write 141
Mixed 141
SusWrite 162
36% 159 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 31.4
4K Mixed 13.2
52% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 31.9
DQ Write 68.4
DQ Mixed 38.8
33% 46.4 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
466GB free
Firmware: 17.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 119 120 120 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 118
Write 109
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 119
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 69%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 16GB
3GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 5.6 8 8.9 8.2 7.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 27.6
Write 17.8
Mixed 18
SusWrite 8
22% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.4
105% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173BH0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 8GB
533, 533 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
28.5% Poor
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 10.5
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7.7
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 23" 1280 720 GSM59C6 LG MONITOR
Typical N68C-GS FX Builds (Compare 153 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $75
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback