PIPO Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPIPO Default string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1200 x 1920 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '21 at 18:35
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Celeron N3450
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Memory 14
1-Core 45.2
2-Core 87.3
26% 48.8 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 170
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 176
12% 176 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
2.29% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 2.3
2% 2.33 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 0.2
3% 2.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.29%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Unknown Biwin 62GB
33GB free (System drive)
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 32 32 31 27 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x1.5GB
4 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
26.3% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.37 GB/s
Latency 368
11% 368 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Default string Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: PIPO Default string

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $22Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback